ArticleJournal of metabolic and bariatric surgery2025
Is Bariatric Surgery at Risk Due to Semaglutide?
Article in Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Obesity remains a significant public health issue in the Western world, affecting millions of Americans and contributing to chronic conditions such as diabetes and hypertension. In June 2021, the Food and Drug Administration approved semaglutide for long-term weight management. While its effectiveness in promoting weight loss has been well-documented, its impact on the field of bariatric surgery remains uncertain. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 515 bariatric patients from January 2022 to November 2023. Patients on semaglutide in the preoperative period were compared to those not using the medication, with outcomes including time to surgery, cancellation rates, weight loss at different time points, and secondary outcomes such as side effects. Results: Thirteen percent of patients were on semaglutide. Semaglutide users had higher rates of diabetes (P<0.001). Starting and preoperative weights were comparable between both groups. Patients on semaglutide were less likely to proceed with surgery (P=0.001). For patients who had surgery, those on semaglutide experienced longer times from evaluation to surgery, compared to patients not taking this medication (8.8 months vs. 7.4 months, P=0.152). Weight loss outcomes at 2- and 6-month post-surgery were similar between groups. Notably, 22% of semaglutide patients no longer qualified for surgery due to successful weight loss. Conclusion: The use of semaglutide has the potential to reduce the number of bariatric surgeries and delay surgical intervention for some patients. However, the long-term effects of semaglutide on weight maintenance and its broader implications for clinical practice require further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.