Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41568121›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of medicine open2026

Influence of Comorbidities on Colorectal Cancer Screening Participation and Mortality.

Rachel Corren, Sylvia La, Edgar Corona, Dalia Martinez, Urmimala Sarkar, Blake Gregory, Uri Ladabaum, Ma Somsouk

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of medicine open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02613260 (Mailed FIT Outreach to Improve Colon Cancer Screening in the Safety-net System), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02613260 nacompletednot on this map

Mailed FIT Outreach to Improve Colon Cancer Screening in the Safety-net System

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2016 to 2019Enrolled13,470ConditionsColonic NeoplasmsArmsFIT Outreach
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rachel CorrenSchool of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, Calif.
Sylvia LaSan Francisco Health Network, San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, Calif.
Edgar CoronaDivision of Gastroenterology, University of California, San Francisco, Calif.
Dalia MartinezClinical Translational Science Institute, University of California, San Francisco, Calif.
Urmimala SarkarDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, Calif.
Blake GregorySan Francisco Health Network, San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, Calif.
Uri LadabaumDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif.
Ma SomsoukDivision of Gastroenterology, University of California, San Francisco, Calif.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Organized screening programs improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening participation, but outreach services can be improved. We sought to understand screening deferral by examining patient-level factors and how they relate to fecal immunochemical test (FIT) orders, completion rates, and long-term mortality. Methods: Patients aged 50-75 years who were not up to date with CRC screening receiving usual care were followed over time (NCT02613260). Patient-level laboratory and cancer registry data were used to identify patients who met a specified laboratory threshold: albumin < 3 g/dL, HIV viral load > 10,000 copies or CD4 < 200 cells/µL, creatinine > 4 mg/dL, platelets < 100,000/µL, total bilirubin > 4 µmol/L, NH3 > 20, positive urine amphetamine or cocaine, serum ethanol > 80, hemoglobin A1C > 10%, and stage 3 or 4 cancer. The proportion of patients with a FIT order, FIT completion in 1-year, and mortality at 8-years were compared in patents with and without the lab abnormality. Results: Nine thousand six hundred seventy-six patients were eligible for screening, of which 1053 met the criteria for laboratory abnormalities. Patients with laboratory abnormalities were less likely to have a FIT order placed (39.5% vs 66.8%, Conclusions: Patients with laboratory abnormalities were less likely to have a FIT order placed and completed, and experienced higher mortality, suggesting that screening was deferred by providers. Future studies should gather provider input to understand how patient-level electronic data could be considered in the implementation of screening services.

Indexed as

Colorectal cancerFecal immunochemical testOrganized screeningPopulation health

Identifiers

PMID41568121
PMCPMC12818108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.