ArticleJCSM communications
Automated Segmentation of Forearm Muscles: Clinical Associations With Hand Function, Muscle Volume and Intramuscular Fat.
Article in JCSM communications. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Hand function is critical for daily activities and declines early in many diseases, conditions or disorders affecting the musculoskeletal and neurologic systems. Muscle health markers derived from clinically available magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans are strongly associated with functional capacity, may enhance clinical assessment and inform management options. However, traditional muscle MRI assessments require time-intensive manual segmentations. Here, we aim to develop and test a computer-vision model for automated forearm muscle segmentation and investigate associations between MRI-derived muscle markers and age, sex, BMI, functional grip strength and dexterity measures. Methods: We recruited 42 healthy, right-handed adults (54.8% female, median age 37.3 years, median BMI: 23.0). Grip strength and dexterity were measured using the NIH Toolbox motor battery. Dixon fat-water MRI of the right forearm was acquired at 3.0 T, and forearm flexor and extensor muscle compartments were manually segmented for model training. A 2D U-Net convolutional neural network model was trained and tested for segmentation of the forearm flexors and extensors for the assessment of muscle volume and intramuscular fat. Testing accuracy and reliability were assessed using Sørensen-Dice indices, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman analyses. Associations between the MRI-derived muscle markers, demographic factors, muscle metrics and hand function were evaluated using partial correlations and regression models. Results: The segmentation model showed high test accuracy, achieving mean Sørensen-Dice indices of 0.89 (flexors) and 0.85 (extensors) and ICCs of 0.75-0.99 for muscle volume and intramuscular fat. Muscle volume was positively correlated with BMI ( Conclusions: Our findings highlight the accuracy and reliability of automated forearm muscle segmentation using computer vision. BMI emerged as a key determinant of muscle volume, independent of age. The strong association between muscle volume and grip strength demonstrates the clinical relevance of these metrics, suggesting potential applications in therapeutic planning for conditions impairing hand function. Sex-based differences in muscle volume underscore the importance of tailored assessments. Computer vision models integrated with Dixon fat-water MRI enable efficient, accurate evaluation of forearm muscle health. Future research should explore these metrics in clinical populations and their utility in tracking functional outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.