Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41568101›Full record

ArticleJCSM communications

Automated Segmentation of Forearm Muscles: Clinical Associations With Hand Function, Muscle Volume and Intramuscular Fat.

Joel Fundaun, Valeria Oliva, Sandrine Bédard, Evert Onno Wesselink, Benjamin P Lynn, Anoosha Pai S, Dario Pfyffer, Merve Kaptan, Nazrawit Berhe, John Ratliff and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCSM communications. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Joel FundaunDivision of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6025-0077
Valeria OlivaDivision of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California USA.
Sandrine BédardDivision of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California USA.
Evert Onno WesselinkDivision of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California USA.
Benjamin P LynnDivision of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California USA.
Anoosha Pai SDepartment of Bioengineering Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California USA.
Dario PfyfferDivision of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California USA.
Merve KaptanDivision of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California USA.
Nazrawit BerheDivision of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California USA.
John RatliffDepartment of Neurosurgery Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California USA.
Serena S HuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California USA.
Zachary A SmithDepartment of Neurosurgery University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center Oklahoma City Oklahoma USA.
Trevor J HastieDepartment of Statistics Stanford University Stanford California USA.
Sean MackeyDivision of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California USA.
Marnee J McKayThe Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney Camperdown New South Whales Australia.
James M ElliottThe Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney Camperdown New South Whales Australia.
Scott L DelpDepartment of Bioengineering and Mechanical Engineering Stanford University Stanford California USA.
Akshay S ChaudhariDepartment of Radiology Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California USA.
Christine S W LawDivision of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California USA.
Andrew C SmithPhysical Therapy Program, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine University of Colorado Aurora Colorado USA.
Kenneth A WeberDivision of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0916-9174

Funding

Prognostic biomarkers for high-impact chronic pain: Development and validationR61NS118651 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MACKEY, SEAN C · 2020 to 2020
$7.3M
Interdisciplinary Research Training in Pain and Substance Use DisordersT32DA035165 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SEAN C MACKEY · 2013 to 2026
$7.2M
MRI-Derived Neuromuscular Signatures to Predict Surgical Response in Degenerative Cervical MyelopathyR01NS128478 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Kenneth Arnold Weber · 2023 to 2026
$2.2M
Neuroimaging and Mentoring in Translational Pain ResearchK24DA029262 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MACKEY, SEAN C · 2010 to 2019
$1.9M
Neuroimaging-Based Brain and Spinal Cord Biomarkers for Cervical RadiculopathyK23NS104211 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WEBER, KENNETH ARNOLD · 2018 to 2022
$875k
Improving mechanistic understanding of responsiveness to spinal cord stimulation after spinal cord injuryK01HD106928 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SMITH, ANDREW CRAIG · 2022 to 2025
$508k
Mentoring in Discovery and Validation of Clinical Chronic Pain BiomarkersK24NS126781 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MACKEY, SEAN C · 2021 to 2021
$324k
NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD106928NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA029262NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA035165NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS104211NINDS NIH HHS K24 NS126781NINDS NIH HHS L30 NS108301NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS128478NINDS NIH HHS R61 NS118651
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hand function is critical for daily activities and declines early in many diseases, conditions or disorders affecting the musculoskeletal and neurologic systems. Muscle health markers derived from clinically available magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans are strongly associated with functional capacity, may enhance clinical assessment and inform management options. However, traditional muscle MRI assessments require time-intensive manual segmentations. Here, we aim to develop and test a computer-vision model for automated forearm muscle segmentation and investigate associations between MRI-derived muscle markers and age, sex, BMI, functional grip strength and dexterity measures. Methods: We recruited 42 healthy, right-handed adults (54.8% female, median age 37.3 years, median BMI: 23.0). Grip strength and dexterity were measured using the NIH Toolbox motor battery. Dixon fat-water MRI of the right forearm was acquired at 3.0 T, and forearm flexor and extensor muscle compartments were manually segmented for model training. A 2D U-Net convolutional neural network model was trained and tested for segmentation of the forearm flexors and extensors for the assessment of muscle volume and intramuscular fat. Testing accuracy and reliability were assessed using Sørensen-Dice indices, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman analyses. Associations between the MRI-derived muscle markers, demographic factors, muscle metrics and hand function were evaluated using partial correlations and regression models. Results: The segmentation model showed high test accuracy, achieving mean Sørensen-Dice indices of 0.89 (flexors) and 0.85 (extensors) and ICCs of 0.75-0.99 for muscle volume and intramuscular fat. Muscle volume was positively correlated with BMI ( Conclusions: Our findings highlight the accuracy and reliability of automated forearm muscle segmentation using computer vision. BMI emerged as a key determinant of muscle volume, independent of age. The strong association between muscle volume and grip strength demonstrates the clinical relevance of these metrics, suggesting potential applications in therapeutic planning for conditions impairing hand function. Sex-based differences in muscle volume underscore the importance of tailored assessments. Computer vision models integrated with Dixon fat-water MRI enable efficient, accurate evaluation of forearm muscle health. Future research should explore these metrics in clinical populations and their utility in tracking functional outcomes.

Indexed as

computer‐assisteddexterityforearmgrip strengthimage processingmagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID41568101
PMCPMC12817650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.