Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41568083›Full record

ArticleAfrican journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence2026

"

Carine Marks, Catharina E Du Plessis, Daniël J Van Hoving, Heinri Zaayman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carine MarksDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa.
Catharina E Du PlessisDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa.
Daniël J Van HovingDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa.
Heinri ZaaymanDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Undifferentiated poisoning cases are common presentations to emergency departments. Clinicians are required to be familiar and up to date with the identification and management of these cases. Game-based learning is a unique educational intervention that facilitates learning and has a proven track record in toxicology education. This study sought to explore the impact of a newly designed board game (ToxiTrail™) on improving the toxicological knowledge of clinicians. Methods: An explorative, qualitative study was performed using focus group interviews on staff working in emergency departments in Tygerberg and Khayelitsha Hospitals, and students enrolled in the Postgraduate Diploma in Medical Toxicology at Stellenbosch University. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis, developing themes related to the educational experience and optimisation of the boardgame. Results: Thirty participants participated in three distinct focus group interviews. Four primary themes were constructed following the interviews, namely: Educational value and clinical relevance of the board game; Engagement and learning experience; Ideal usage scenarios and target audience; and Recommendations for improvement. Discussion: Our study showed that the boardgame intervention enhanced the learning and understanding of toxicology concepts amongst participants, identified knowledge gaps and promoted storytelling. The active engagement of the game promoted the retention of knowledge from a real-world perspective and was a fun alternative to other educational instruction methods. Furthermore, the interviews assisted in improving the boardgame.

Indexed as

Board gameEducationGame-based learningGamificationToxicology

Identifiers

PMID41568083
PMCPMC12818122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.