ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2026
Machine learning-based multi-class classification of bladder pathologies using fused 3D CT radiomic and 3D auto-encoder deep features.
Article in European journal of radiology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop an automated analytical framework that integrates hybrid radiomics and deep learning features from non-contrast CT images for the multi-class classification of bladder pathologies. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 902 CT scans (584 normal, 142 calculi, 66 cancers, 110 cystitis). An integrated pipeline was implemented, comprising: 1) automatic bladder segmentation using a 3D-UNet, 2) hybrid feature extraction combining 100 radiomics features and 256 deep features from a 3D convolutional autoencoder, 3) feature selection via variance thresholding and LASSO regression, and 4) final classification using an XGBoost classifier. The dataset was split into training (80 %) and validation (20 %) sets. Performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) with a one-vs-rest strategy for multi-class classification. Model stability was assessed via stratified five-fold cross-validation, and interpretability was analyzed with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Results: The framework achieved one-vs-rest AUROCs of 0.94 (95 % CI: 0.89-0.99) for calculi, 0.92 (0.85-0.99) for cancer, 0.90 (0.84-0.95) for normal bladder, and 0.83 (0.75-0.91) for cystitis. The micro-average AUROC for four-class discrimination was 0.94 (0.92-0.96). Binary normal/abnormal classification demonstrated stable performance across cross-validation folds (AUROC range: 0.89-0.92). SHAP analysis revealed that radiomic features dominated decisions for calculi/normal differentiation, while deep features were critical for distinguishing cancer and cystitis. Conclusion: The proposed hybrid CT analysis framework achieves clinically relevant performance in the automated, multi-class classification of bladder pathologies, excelling particularly in calculi detection. The complementary roles of radiomic and deep features provide an interpretable diagnostic aid, demonstrating potential for integration into clinical workflows to support differential diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.