ArticleBiochemistry and biophysics reports2026
Heat-induced antigen retrieval by using Tris-EDTA solution destroys nuclear structure in certain tissues.
Article in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tris-EDTA buffer (pH 9.0) is widely used for heat-induced antigen retrieval (HIAR) in immunohistochemistry due to its high efficiency. However, it remains unclear whether Tris-EDTA is equally suitable for all tissues and for the detection of both nuclear and non-nuclear antigens. In this study, we systematically evaluated the effects of Tris-EDTA HIAR on mouse and human tissues. Nuclear morphology was assessed by DAPI and hematoxylin staining, while immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence were used to detect nuclear and non-nuclear antigens. We found that Tris-EDTA HIAR caused selective nuclear disruption (nuclear content leakage) in thyroid, lung, and kidney tissues, manifested as weak or abnormal staining. Consequently, nuclear antigens in these tissues showed poor detection, including weak signals, mislocalization, or complete loss. In contrast, nuclear antigen detection was preserved when citrate buffer (pH 6.0) was used. For non-nuclear antigens, however, Tris-EDTA HIAR generally produced stronger staining than citrate buffer. Although nuclear content leakage may lead to slightly higher background, Tris-EDTA HIAR did not appear to damage the antigens themselves. In addition, both the pH and the antigen retrieval method influence the nuclear morphology in Tris-EDTA-treated sensitive tissues. In conclusion, Tris-EDTA HIAR should be used with caution for nuclear antigen detection in thyroid, lung, and kidney tissues but remains effective for non-nuclear antigens. These findings provide practical guidance for optimizing antigen retrieval strategies in both clinical diagnostics and research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.