ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2025
Stain-free artificial intelligence-assisted light microscopy for the identification of leukocyte morphology change in presence of bacteria.
Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rapid detection of bacterial infections through leukocyte activation analysis could significantly reduce diagnostic timeframes from days to hours. Traditional methods like flow cytometry and biomarker assays face limitations including technical complexity, equipment requirements, and delayed results. Methods: We developed a dual artificial neural network system combining stain-free light microscopy with microfluidic technology to detect morphological changes in activated leukocytes. YOLOv4 networks were trained using five-fold cross-validation on images of chemically stimulated leukocyte subpopulations (lymphocytes, monocytes, and neutrophils) and validated against flow cytometry. The system was tested on whole blood samples spiked with Results: The optimized four-class network achieved high performance metrics for lymphocytes (F1 score: 80.1% ± 2.5%) and neutrophils (F1 score: 91.7% ± 1.7%), while a specialized binary classifier for monocytes achieved 97.0% ± 2.8% F1 score. In bacteria-spiked whole blood experiments, the system successfully detected activated leukocytes within 30 min at concentrations approaching clinical blood culture detection limits (11.11 ± 4.79 CFU/mL). Neutrophils showed rapid activation peaking at 1-3 h, while lymphocyte activation increased gradually over 6-12 h, consistent with innate versus adaptive immune response kinetics. Conclusion: This AI-assisted microscopy platform enables rapid, label-free detection of leukocyte activation in response to bacterial infection with minimal sample handling and no requirement for specialized staining or trained technicians. The technology demonstrates potential for accelerating infection diagnosis and could be extended to other pathologies with morphological manifestations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.