Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41568037›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2025

Detonating a "time bomb": how enteric infection stress triggers prophage induction in commensal microbiota and exacerbates disease progression.

Ling Yang, Yan Xu, Xinna Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ling YangSchool of Public Health and Health Management, Qujing University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Qujing, China.
Yan XuSchool of Pediatrics, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
Xinna WangDepartment of Encephalopathy, Affiliated Hospital of Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pathophysiology of enteric infections involves more than a straightforward pathogen-host interaction; a critical yet often underappreciated factor is the functional shift of the commensal microbiota in response to stress. This review constructs and substantiates a "Prophage-Mediated Implosion Hypothesis" to provide an integrative framework for explaining the complexities of gut infections. This hypothesis posits that during enteric infection, the stress microenvironment-generated by the pathogen, host immune responses, and clinical interventions-transforms the commensal microbiota from a "defensive barrier" into a "destructive endogenous amplifier" via prophage activation. This article systematically elucidates the three core stages of this "implosion" process: (1) how key signaling networks, represented by endogenous DNA damage (e.g., reactive oxygen species [ROS]) and exogenous agents (e.g., antibiotics), trigger the SOS response and activate prophages; (2) how prophage activation disrupts colonization resistance (via commensal lysis), mediates the horizontal transfer of virulence and resistance genes, and exacerbates inflammation (via PAMPs and the TLR9 pathway), thereby creating a destructive cascade; and (3) how this hypothesis offers novel mechanistic explanations for clinical challenges such as antibiotic-associated complications and the heterogeneity in infection severity. Finally, building on this framework, the review discusses emerging intervention strategies-such as antibiotics that spare or support bacteriophage activity and therapies targeting the SOS response to attenuate bacterial virulence. This work aims to shift the understanding of enteric infections from a traditional "external invasion" model to an integrated "combined internal and external assault" model.

Indexed as

commensal microbiotadefensive barrierenteric infection stressexacerbates diseaseprophage

Identifiers

PMID41568037
PMCPMC12816167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.