ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025
Machine learning models diagnose oral squamous cell carcinoma based on cross-cohort oral microbial signatures.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Toward Smart Salivary Diagnostics: A Comprehensive Review of Heavy Metal Biomarkers and Digital Risk Modeling.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The saliva microbiome of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients has been gradually unveiled, but there is a lack of cross-cohort studies, and there is no non-invasive diagnostic model across cohorts for OSCC. Methods: This study aimed to investigate the differences in saliva microbial composition between OSCC patients and healthy individuals using cross-cohort saliva microbiome data, comprising 354 healthy individuals and 311 OSCC patients (total Results: We found significant differences in saliva microbial composition between OSCC patients and healthy people. Seven microorganisms were significantly reduced and seven were significantly increased in OSCC patients, serving as potential biomarkers. Machine learning models, including Random Forest, Extra Trees, Gradient Boosting, and XGBoost, were constructed to diagnose OSCC using saliva microorganisms. These models achieved area under the curve (AUC) values ranging from 63.1% to 96.9% at both genus and species levels in a rigorous leave-one-cohort-out cross-validation. Discussion: Our study provides a robust non-invasive diagnostic model for OSCC and demonstrates that high diagnostic accuracy is achievable at both genus and species levels, suggesting that taxonomic resolution is not the primary limiting factor. Instead, the choice of model construction methods is crucial. Therefore, greater attention should be paid to the selection of model methods in clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.