Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41568026›Full record

ReviewHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2025

Holistic perinatal care during intimate examinations: An integrative review.

Ntsoaki M Tshabalala, Mariatha Yazbek, Carin Maree

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ntsoaki M TshabalalaDepartment of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4800-037X
Mariatha YazbekDepartment of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9311-5063
Carin MareeDepartment of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3477-7275

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Intimate examinations are vital in midwifery, but without proper care and communication, they can cause distress, especially for first-time pregnant women. A holistic approach that addresses physical, emotional, social, psychological and spiritual needs is essential for ensuring comprehensive and compassionate care. Aim: To review existing literature on holistic perinatal care during intimate examinations. Method: An integrative review was conducted across relevant databases, which included Google Scholar, PubMed, Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and Elton Bryson Stephens Company (EBSCO) host to identify original research articles published in English between 2014 and 2024. In total, 67 articles which met the inclusion criteria were reviewed: 32 were international, 30 were from sub-Saharan Africa and 5 were from South Africa. Results: This study highlights two key aspects of holistic perinatal care during intimate examinations: Conclusion: Most studies focus on pregnancy-related interventions rather than holistic perinatal care during intimate examinations, and there are no maternity guidelines for such examinations in Africa. This review highlights the need for further research and outlines the biological, psychosocial and ethical considerations for improving perinatal care. Contribution: This study highlights the importance of holistic perinatal care during intimate examinations, emphasising biological, psychological and social aspects to enhance women's experiences. It identifies gaps in maternity guidelines, particularly in Africa, and calls for further research to ensure comprehensive, women-centred care.

Indexed as

guidelinesholisticintimate examinationsperinatal carePerinatal period

Identifiers

PMID41568026
PMCPMC12817015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.