ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2025
Nurse educators' experiences implementing work-integrated learning in the R171 nursing program at a college.
Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The global call for nursing education transformation is gaining momentum. South Africa's R171 nursing programme, revised since 1984, aims to produce generalist nurse practitioners with required competencies. This research aims to explore nurse educators' experiences in implementing the R171 nursing programme. Aim: To explore the experiences of nurse educators implementing R171 work-integrated learning (WIL). Setting: The interviews took place at a nursing college in a private room with no interruptions. Unstructured interviews were used. Methods: The study utilised a qualitative descriptive phenomenological design to investigate the experiences of nurse educators implementing the R171 nursing programme. The participants were selected through non-probability purposive sampling from the Gauteng College of Nursing (GCON) campuses. The sample size was determined by data saturation. Data were collected through unstructured interviews. Results: The study identifies five themes: WIL allocation in the R171 nursing programme, challenges faced by nurse educators, consequences of these challenges, identified strengths and recommendations made by these educators for implementing the R171 WIL programme. Conclusion: The study revealed challenges in student nurse placements, including access to clinical practice areas, discipline time, assessments, staff shortage and resource limitations. Contribution: The study recommends revising the R171 programme, phasing it out over a year, increasing WIL hours, starting the primary healthcare (PHC) module in the second year, improving infrastructure and re-establishing the Clinical Education and Training Unit (CETU).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.