Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41567997›Full record

ArticleDiscover social science and health2026

A community-based participatory research program to identify lead exposure risks and community priorities.

Jocelyn Zavala-Garcia, Nina Ali, Obed Arango, Caitlin Brady, Rosalba Esquivel-Cote, Steven T Goldsmith, Holly Link, Diana Lugo, Serena Matos, Ruth McDermott-Levy and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover social science and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jocelyn Zavala-GarciaM. Louise Fitzpatrick College of Nursing, Villanova University, Villanova, PA USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7123-2288
Nina AliPresent Address: School of Nursing, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY USA.ORCID 0009-0006-7330-5771
Obed ArangoCentro de Cultura, Arte, Trabajo y Educación, Norristown, PA USA.
Caitlin BradyCentro de Cultura, Arte, Trabajo y Educación, Norristown, PA USA.
Rosalba Esquivel-CoteCentro de Cultura, Arte, Trabajo y Educación, Norristown, PA USA.
Steven T GoldsmithDepartment of Geography and the Environment, Villanova University, Villanova, PA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5413-7796
Holly LinkCentro de Cultura, Arte, Trabajo y Educación, Norristown, PA USA.
Diana LugoCentro de Cultura, Arte, Trabajo y Educación, Norristown, PA USA.
Serena MatosM. Louise Fitzpatrick College of Nursing, Villanova University, Villanova, PA USA.
Ruth McDermott-LevyM. Louise Fitzpatrick College of Nursing, Villanova University, Villanova, PA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8451-8362
Kabindra M ShakyaDepartment of Geography and the Environment, Villanova University, Villanova, PA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7035-7019
Daniel J SmithM. Louise Fitzpatrick College of Nursing, Villanova University, Villanova, PA USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4471-8885
CCATE Círculo de Salud

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lead is an environmental health hazard that disproportionately impacts communities of color across the United States (U.S.). Recent incidents of widespread lead exposure have been linked to aging infrastructure, historical land use, and challenges in lead remediation. Objective: To understand community-identified concerns, needs, and priorities related to lead exposure. Methods: Four focus groups with a total of 73 community members, were conducted in Norristown, Pennsylvania, U.S. from Fall 2022 to Spring 2023. Using a community-based participatory research (CBPR) framework and a semi-structured interview guide, participants were asked questions regarding their perceived exposure to lead and current exposure prevention methods. Open coding was used to conduct a thematic analysis of the transcript data. Results: Four themes were identified: (1) community reportesources of concern, including water, soil, and paint; (2) lack of information surrounding lead, particularly in Spanish; (3) systemic neglect, from workplaces, healthcare systems, and landlords; and (4) financial implications, from high costs and fear of displacement. Participants expressed a desire for lead testing of household water, paint, and soil, as well as personal blood lead level screening. Conclusions & implications: : There was broad community support for a lead exposure risk assessment that investigated soil, tap water, and paint sources of lead, as well as the prevalence of elevated blood lead levels in adults and children. The study also highlighted the lack of information about lead exposure in non-English speaking communities, the need for providing language-appropriate information, and the necessity for multiple lead exposure assessment methods. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44155-025-00344-9.

Indexed as

Behaviors and disease preventionFamilyHealth promotionLead exposure riskSocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID41567997
PMCPMC12816125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.