ReviewInternational journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease2026
Biventricular remodeling and function after Cone repair of Ebstein Anomaly: A review.
Review in International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Primary Tricuspid Regurgitation in ACHD: Diagnosis and Treatment.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Cone reconstruction is the prevailing repair strategy for Ebstein anomaly (EA), providing near-anatomical restoration of the tricuspid valve (TV) and reliable reduction of tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Most of the risk of Cone repair is seen in the early postoperative period from dehiscence, with very low rates of mortality and reintervention thereafter. By correcting TV dysfunction and abnormal right ventricle (RV) geometry, ventricular reverse remodeling has been demonstrated through decreased right atrial and atrialized RV size, along with improved antegrade pulmonary flow and consequent left ventricular filling. Early postoperative RV dysfunction is common due to increased afterload upon addressing TR, with suggestion of delayed recovery. Cone repair augments left ventricular preload and preserves left ventricular function. The contrasting effects of ventricular plication and superior repositioning of TV during the Cone repair has led to discrepant reports in the trajectory of RV remodeling, which is further confounded by the lack of standardization in imaging measurements and timing of surveillance. Consistency in imaging protocol and lengthening follow-up will hopefully provide a more robust understanding about the evolution of the postoperative RV. Improvement in functional status and aerobic capacity can also be appreciated post-Cone repair, particularly in highly symptomatic patients. Innovation to promote remodeling of the Ebsteinoid heart include stem cell therapy at the time of surgical repair, which has shown promise in phase I clinical trial. Lastly, the goal of biventricular repair through Cone reconstruction can be facilitated by Starnes palliation to stabilize critical presentations, a paradigm shift that is increasingly adopted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.