ArticleArthroplasty today2026
Robotic-Assisted Medial Epicondylar Osteotomy and Dual Fixation Technique During Total Knee Arthroplasty for Severe Varus Deformity.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report a robotic-assisted sliding medial epicondylar osteotomy along with a transosseous dual-fixation technique to balance severe varus deformities that are not amenable to medial release during total knee arthroplasty. A 60-year-old woman with bilateral knee osteoarthritis and a varus deformity of about 50° (hip-knee-ankle angle: Right 133°, left 127°) underwent staggered, bilateral robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Despite excising osteophytes, performing a complete medial release, a reduction osteotomy, and reconstructing the medial tibial defect with a 10 mm modular metal augment, a significant imbalance with 9.5° of varus deformity remained uncorrected. Therefore, a medial epicondylar osteotomy was performed. The osteotomy fragment was displaced distally and posteriorly under real-time robotic control to achieve equal flexion and extension gaps. Robotic workflow is also used to monitor alignment and gaps during component cementation and osteotomy fixation. A dual-fixation technique is described using 2 interfragmentary cannulated screws and 2 transosseous nonabsorbable sutures to counter the deforming forces. The osteotomies healed bilaterally at 8 weeks. After 9 months of follow-up, the patient reports no pain, walks independently, has a range of motion of 0° to 115° bilaterally, and has a hip-knee-ankle angle of 178° on the right and 179° on the left.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.