ArticleCase reports in oncology
Synchronous Rectal Adenocarcinoma and Sigmoid Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: A Case Report.
Article in Case reports in oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The synchronous presentation of a colorectal adenocarcinoma and a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a rare clinical event that poses significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. These two malignancies arise from distinct histogenetic origins and are typically managed with different treatment paradigms. The incidental discovery of a GIST during the workup for a more symptomatic adenocarcinoma complicates surgical planning and requires a comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach to ensure optimal oncologic outcomes. Case Presentation: An 85-year-old female presented with a 6-month history of debilitating fecal incontinence, tenesmus, rectal bleeding, and a 13 kg weight loss. Diagnostic evaluation, including imaging and endoscopy, identified two separate lesions: a large, ulcerated mass in the mid-rectum and a pedunculated mass in the sigmoid colon. Biopsies with immunohistochemical analysis confirmed the rectal mass as a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma (CK20+, CDX2+) and the sigmoid mass as a spindle-cell neoplasm consistent with a GIST (CD117+, DOG1+). Due to the local invasion of the rectal cancer into the posterior vaginal wall, the patient underwent an open en bloc abdominoperineal resection, which included a hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, posterior vaginectomy, and sigmoidectomy. Final pathology confirmed a pT3N0 rectal adenocarcinoma with negative margins and a completely resected 3.5 cm low-risk sigmoid GIST. The patient was followed for 24 months with no evidence of recurrence of either tumor. Postoperatively, her presenting symptoms of tenesmus and bleeding resolved. Conclusion: This case demonstrates the critical role of immunohistochemistry in confirming synchronous primary tumors. For complex, locally advanced disease, radical upfront en bloc resection remains the gold standard for achieving curative-intent, negative margins, even in the elderly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.