Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41567918›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes Following Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Term Prelabor Rupture of Membranes (PROM): Evidence From a Systematic Review.

Mohammedelfateh Adam, Aya Eltom Hajo Elsheikh, Ryan Osman Alhessen Saidahmed, Rawan Awad Amer Ahmed, Jihan Ahmed Osman Duffuaa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohammedelfateh AdamObstetrics and Gynecology, Cork University Maternity Hospital, Cork, IRL.
Aya Eltom Hajo ElsheikhObstetrics and Gynecology, Sudanese Medical Specialisation Board, Khartoum, SDN.
Ryan Osman Alhessen SaidahmedObstetrics and Gynecology, Sabt Al Alaya General Hospital, Sabt Al Alayah, SAU.
Rawan Awad Amer AhmedAnatomical Sciences, St George's University, St George's, GRD.
Jihan Ahmed Osman DuffuaaObstetrics and Gynecology, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, SDN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Term prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) is a common obstetric event associated with an increased risk of maternal and neonatal infectious morbidity. The use of antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent these complications is widespread, yet its efficacy remains debated due to conflicting evidence and concerns regarding antimicrobial resistance. This systematic review aimed to synthesize the existing evidence on the impact of antibiotic prophylaxis on maternal and neonatal outcomes in term PROM. A systematic literature search was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines across PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception. Studies including pregnant women with term PROM (≥37 weeks) comparing antibiotic prophylaxis to placebo, no treatment, or different timing strategies were eligible. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool for non-randomized studies. A narrative synthesis was performed due to significant clinical and methodological heterogeneity. Six studies (four RCTs and two retrospective cohorts) were included. The findings were inconsistent. Three studies reported a significant reduction in maternal infections (chorioamnionitis, endometritis) with antibiotic prophylaxis, while two large studies found no significant benefit. For neonatal outcomes, two studies reported a significant reduction in neonatal sepsis, whereas three others found no statistically significant difference. Evidence regarding the optimal timing of antibiotic administration was also conflicting, with one high-quality study finding no benefit for administration within 6-12 hours versus later, while others suggested earlier administration was associated with better outcomes. The overall risk of bias was low for the majority of the included studies. The evidence supporting the routine use of antibiotic prophylaxis for all women with term PROM was inconclusive. While a reduction in maternal infection was observed in some studies, this benefit was not universal, and the effect on neonatal sepsis remains uncertain. A targeted approach, considering individual risk factors such as prolonged membrane rupture or Group B Streptococcus colonization, may be more appropriate than universal prophylaxis. Further high-quality research is needed to define the optimal timing and candidate population for this intervention.

Indexed as

antibiotic prophylaxischorioamnionitismaternal outcomesneonatal outcomesneonatal sepsissystematic reviewterm premature rupture of membranes

Identifiers

PMID41567918
PMCPMC12817100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.