ArticleCureus2025
Drivers of No-Show for Ambulatory Appendectomy at Kyabirwa Surgical Center, Jinja City, Uganda.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Appendicitis is a highly prevalent acute abdominal condition that has been increasing in prevalence since 1990. Millions of cases were registered in 2024 alone, along with thousands of deaths and more than a million disability-adjusted life-years. Such outcomes are inextricably associated with complicated appendicitis that has not been surgically treated. Sadly, a significant proportion of patients diagnosed with surgically treatable appendicitis and scheduled for appendectomy do not show up for surgery, even at standalone ambulatory surgery facilities where such surgery is comparatively cheaper. Objective This study aimed to assess the drivers of no-shows for ambulatory appendectomy at Kyabirwa Surgical Center (KSC), Jinja, Uganda. Method This cross-sectional study included 36 adult patients who were diagnosed with appendicitis at Kyabirwa Surgical Center and booked for an appendectomy between 2022 and 2025. The patients were consecutively sampled and engaged at the community level through structured interviews. Clinical data were abstracted and descriptively analyzed using SPSS version 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, USA), along with a log-binomial model for multivariate analysis in the same program. Results The no-show rate for ambulatory appendectomies at Kyabirwa Surgical Center was 50% (18), although 67% (24)of all patients underwent appendectomy, with one-quarter (25%, 6) receiving it at other facilities. The perception of being able to afford an appendectomy without difficulty, having personal transportation to the facility, and access to transportation in general reduce the no-show rate. However, the perceived cost of appendectomy at Kyabirwa Surgical Center was high (unaffordable), and the fear of not waking up during surgery (tomophobia) increased the no-show rate. Conclusion The prevention of no-shows for appendectomy among patients at KSC is concerning; only half of the patients scheduled for that surgery appear at the center. One-quarter of them underwent surgery at other facilities, while the rest did not. This patient behavior is squarely linked to individual patient characteristics, largely tomophobia, and the perceived high cost of ambulatory appendectomies. In the future, the administration and staff of Kyabirwa Surgical Center may consider preoperatively educating and sensitizing all patients scheduled for ambulatory appendectomy or any ambulatory surgery about the comparatively lower cost of their ambulatory surgical procedures at Kyabirwa Surgical Center compared to other non-ambulatory facilities. This might help alleviate negative perceptions of the affordability of surgeries, such as appendectomies, which are at the center, thereby reducing no-show prevalence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.