ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2026
Enhancing deep learning interpretability for hand-crafted feature-guided histologic image classification via weak-to-strong generalization.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Performance and generalization analysis of machine learning, deep learning, and transformer models for histopathology image classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Enhancing deep learning interpretability for hand-crafted feature-guided histologic image classification via weak-to-strong generalization.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Deep learning (DL) models have achieved promising performance in histologic whole-slide image analysis for various clinical applications. However, their black-box nature hinders the interpretability of DL features for clinical adoption. By contrast, hand-crafted features (HCFs) directly calculated from images offer strong interpretability but with reduced predictive power of DL models. The relationship between DL features and HCFs remains insufficiently explored. We aim to enhance the interpretability and performance of DL models using a weak-to-strong generalization (WSG) framework that integrates HCFs into the learning process. Approach: The proposed WSG framework leverages an interpretable and HCF-based "weak" teacher model that supervises a "strong" DL student model to learn and improve itself by generalizing from weaker forms of reasoning to stronger ones, for classification tasks. An adaptive bootstrap WSG loss function is designed to optimize the transfer of knowledge from hand-crafted to deep-learned features, enabling systematic analysis of feature interactions. Innovatively, mutual information (MI) between HCFs and DL features learned by student models is analyzed to gain insights into their correlations and the interpretability of DL features. The framework is evaluated using extensive experiments on three public datasets with diverse combinations of teacher and student models for tumor classification. Results: The WSG framework achieves consistent improvements in classification performance across all evaluated models. Qualitative saliency-map analysis indicates that WSG supervision enables student models to concentrate on diagnostically relevant regions, thereby improving interpretability. Furthermore, quantitative analysis reveals a notable increase in MI between hand-crafted and deep-learned features following WSG training compared with that without WSG training, indicating more effective integration of expert knowledge into the learned representations. Conclusions: Our study elucidates the key HCFs that drive DL model predictions in histologic image classification. The findings demonstrate that integrating HCFs into DL model training via the WSG framework can enhance both the interpretability and the model's predictive performance, supporting their broader clinical adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.