Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41567857›Full record

ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2026

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of women related to human and animal feces management in Ethiopia: Evidence for strengthening water, sanitation, and hygiene (WaSH) initiatives.

Birhanu Hadush, Chaltu Fikru, Girma Kebede, Syum Guesh, Enquebaher Kassaye, Getachew Redae, Kebede Amenu, Lisa Cavalerie, Siobhan M Mor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Birhanu HadushCollege of Veterinary Sciences, Mekelle University, Ethiopia.
Chaltu FikruSchool of Public Health, Jimma University, Ethiopia.
Girma KebedeCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.
Syum GueshCollege of Veterinary Sciences, Mekelle University, Ethiopia.
Enquebaher KassayeCollege of Veterinary Sciences, Mekelle University, Ethiopia.
Getachew RedaeSchool of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Mekelle University, Ethiopia.
Kebede AmenuCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.
Lisa CavalerieInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Siobhan M MorInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Water, sanitation, and hygiene (WaSH) programs aim to prevent feco-oral disease transmission, but their effectiveness in low- and middle-income countries is often compromised by frequent exposure to animal feces. In Ethiopia, national initiatives such as the Health Extension Program and Community-Led Total Sanitation and Hygiene program have expanded WaSH coverage but do not currently address animal-associated risks. This study investigated knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to human and animal feces management in Butajira, Gilgel Gibe, and Kilite Awlaelo Health and Demographic Surveillance Sites (HDSS) in Ethiopia. Methods: A community-based, cross-sectional study was conducted through random sampling of households in selected kebeles across the three HDSS sites. Eligible households owned up to 60 livestock, including at least one head of cattle. Adult women ( Results: The median age of participants ranged from 35 to 45 years, with female-headed households most frequent in Butajira (42.2 %). Literacy levels were lowest in Gilgel Gibe (64.1 % illiteracy). Most households accessed improved water sources, though unimproved sources were important in Gilgel Gibe (16.3 %). Improved toilet facilities were most common in Gilgel Gibe (61 %). At least 79 % of respondents reported handwashing after toilet use, with moderate soap use (>73 %). Manure management was primarily the responsibility of adult women (>74 %), often using bare hands. Handwashing with soap after manure handling was common in Kilite Awlaelo (>97 %) but lower in Butajira (86.3 %) and Gilgel Gibe (74.8 %). Awareness of health risks from animal manure was lower than for human feces, especially in Gilgel Gibe (70 %) and Butajira (53.2 %). Similarly, awareness of the benefits of composting or drying manure to prevent germ spread was lower in these sites. Conclusions: Despite high awareness of WaSH-related risks, critical gaps exist in understanding manure-associated health risks, particularly in Butajira and Gilgel Gibe. Targeted interventions are needed to raise awareness and improve manure management, especially among women.

Indexed as

Animal manureHandwashingHDSSWASH

Identifiers

PMID41567857
PMCPMC12818063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.