ArticleEnvironmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.)2026
Assessing greenspace and cardiovascular disease risk through deep learning analysis of street-view imagery in the US-based nationwide Nurses' Health Study.
Article in Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Street view-based exposure to greenspace and mortality: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.Environment international · 2026Article
- Residential Environmental Composition and Risk of Acute Cellular Rejection After Heart Transplantation: A Multi-Scale Buffer Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Associations of street-view greenspace exposure with cardiovascular health (Life's Essential 8) among women in midlife.Biology of sex differences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Living near greenspace is associated with decreased cardiovascular disease (CVD). Greenspace estimates, however, typically represent all types of vegetation using top-down satellite images, which incorporate exposure misclassification and limit policy relevance. Objective: We studied the association between street-view greenspace measures with incident CVD using a large, long-term prospective US cohort of female nurses. Methods: We estimated the percentage of streetscapes composed of visible trees, grass, and other green (plants/flowers/fields) from 350 million street-view images using deep learning models. Estimates were applied to Nurses' Health Study participants (N = 88,788) within 500 m of their residential addresses. We used Cox models to estimate associations from 2000 to 2018 between street-view greenspace measures and risk of incident CVD, assessed through self-report, medical record review, or death certificates, and adjusted for individual- and area-level factors. Results: In adjusted models, higher percentages of visible trees were associated with lower CVD incidence (hazard ratio [HR] per interquartile range [IQR] 0.96 (95% confidence interval 0.93, 1.00]), while higher percentages of visible grass (HR 1.06 [1.02, 1.11]) and other green space types (HR 1.03 [1.01, 1.04]) were associated with higher CVD incidence. We did not observe evidence of effect modification by population density, Census region, air pollution, satellite-based vegetation, or neighborhood socioeconomic status. Findings were robust to adjustment for other spatial and behavioral factors and persisted even after adjustment for traditional satellite-based vegetation indices. Discussion: Specific greenspace types may be protective or harmful for CVD. Aggregating greenspace into a single exposure category limits epidemiological research and potential interventions to increase health-promoting greenspace.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.