ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
The theoretical impact of AI-based quality evaluation of short-video health information on public cognition and treatment adherence: a case study of denosumab combined with PD-1/PD-L1 therapy for lung cancer bone metastasis.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the quality and reliability of rotator cuff injury related videos on Bilibili and TikTok: A cross-sectional analysis.Medicine · 2026Article
- Reframing the starting point of shared decision-making under algorithmic short-form video exposure: bone tumor care as a sentinel context.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bone metastasis occurs in 30-40% of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and denosumab combined with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors has emerged as a promising treatment strategy. However, the "algorithmic echo chamber" effect on short-video platforms may distort patient cognition and treatment decision-making. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using a custom-developed web crawler to collect 1,369 videos from Bilibili, Douyin, and Xiaohongshu. A total of 402 videos were included after a three-tier keyword filtering process. An AI-based evaluation system built upon the doubao-seed-1.6 model was established, integrating three international standards-Global Quality Score (GQS), Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, and the modified DISCERN tool-to assess multidimensional information quality. Kruskal-Wallis tests and Spearman correlation analyses were performed to explore inter-platform differences and the relationship between information quality and user engagement metrics. Results: Overall video quality was substantially below professional medical standards: the mean GQS was 2.84 ± 1.06 (56.8% of the full score), JAMA was 0.34 ± 0.57 (8.5%), and modified DISCERN was 1.55 ± 0.69 (31.0%). Significant quality differences were observed across platforms ( Conclusion: From a behavioral and cognitive perspective, the low quality of immune-oncology information on short-video platforms, coupled with algorithm-driven amplification of high-engagement but low-quality content, may exacerbate cognitive bias, potentially increasing clinical safety risks such as insufficient hypocalcemia monitoring and inadequate MRONJ prevention. Establishing a professional governance and oversight system is urgently required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.