Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41567711›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2026

Experience of NHS diagnostic investigation following a multi-cancer early detection (MCED) screening test: qualitative interviews with NHS-Galleri trial participants who had a cancer signal detected.

Laura A V Marlow, Ninian Schmeising-Barnes, Jo Waller

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05611632 (A Randomized, Controlled Trial to Assess the Clinical Utility of a Multi-cancer Early Detection), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05611632 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

A Randomized, Controlled Trial to Assess the Clinical Utility of a Multi-cancer Early Detection (MCED) Test for Population Screening in the United Kingdom (UK) When Added to Standard of Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorGRAIL, Inc.Ran2021 to 2031Enrolled142,318ConditionsCancerArmsMulti-cancer early detection test (Galleri test)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura A V MarlowCentre for Cancer Screening, Prevention and Early Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 1HH, UK.
Ninian Schmeising-BarnesCentre for Cancer Screening, Prevention and Early Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 1HH, UK.
Jo WallerCentre for Cancer Screening, Prevention and Early Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 1HH, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Understanding experiences of diagnostic investigation for any new screening modality is important to inform the development of pathways for future implementation. We explored experience of diagnostic work-up within the NHS in people with a cancer signal detected result from a blood-based multi-cancer early detection (MCED) screening test in the NHS-Galleri trial (NCT05611632). Methods: A subset of 41 participants with a cancer signal detected result (with/without a cancer diagnosis), were interviewed 6-months after their result. Participants described their experiences of diagnostic investigation within the NHS. Reflexive Thematic Analysis was used. Findings: The journey through the period of diagnostic investigation was extremely varied since this was dependent on the predicted cancer site(s). Participant narratives demonstrated wide variation in the required tests, number of contacts with healthcare staff and duration of the whole process. Five themes were interpreted from participants' narratives: i) Feeling prepared for procedures; ii) Needing to advocate; iii) Needing to self-navigate: iv) Speed of the diagnostic process and having to wait; v) Reaching 'the end' of diagnostic work-up. Interpretation: If MCED screening is implemented in future, it will be important to carefully consider implementation of appropriate diagnostic investigation for patients who have a cancer signal detected. We recommend minimising the length of the diagnostic testing period, offering patient navigation and formulating clear plans for what happens at the end of the patient journey. While our findings highlight important considerations to support positive experiences for those having follow-up tests after a cancer signal detected result, they also have broader application for improvement of cancer diagnostic pathways more generally. Funding: This work was funded and sponsored by GRAIL Bio UK, Ltd. as a sub-study within the NHS-Galleri trial. GRAIL funded the costs of the data collection as well as staff salaries through a contract with King's College London/Queen Mary University of London.

Indexed as

CommunicationDiagnosticFollow-upHealth serviceInvestigationLiquid biopsyMCDMCEDNavigationPatient informationSupportTrial

Identifiers

PMID41567711
PMCPMC12818057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.