ArticleEndoscopy international open2025
Identifying high-risk patients having ERCP as a day surgery with an online prediction platform: Multicohort validation of a machine learning model.
Article in Endoscopy international open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Different Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilation Duration Time on Complications of Common Bile Duct Stone Patient
Does the Gallbladder Status Influence the Occurence of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Choledochopancreatography(ERCP) -Choledocholithiasis
If Chronic Gallbladder Diseases Increase the Occurence of Post Endoscopic Retrograde Choledochopancreatography Choledocholithiasis(a Prospective Multi-center Cohort Study)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and study aims: This study aimed to develop a clinical prediction model to assess the 24-hour post-ERCP complication risk in patients with common bile duct stones (CBDs), guiding clinical decision-making for ERCP as a day surgery. Patients and methods: Retrospective data from The First Hospital of Lanzhou University (2010-2019) and prospective multicenter data on post-ERCP complications (2020-2023) were collected and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04234126, NCT04242394). The ADASYN method was used for dataset balancing. Machine learning algorithms, including KNN, XGBoost, RF, SVM, and NB, were compared with traditional models. External validation was performed with retrospective data from other ERCP centers (2015-2017) and The First Hospital of Lanzhou University (2019-2020), with registration under NCT02510495. The optimal model was selected based on the ROC curve (AUC), and an online prediction tool was developed. Results: A logistic regression (LR) model incorporating seven feature variables-mechanical lithotripsy, pancreatic duct cannulation, bile duct dilation, residual stones, white blood cell count, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level, and pancreatic duct stent placement-was identified as the optimal model, The model yielded specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, and AUC values of 0.835, 0.655, 0.807, and 0.819 in the external validation set, with a second external validation set providing additional results of 0.799, 0.714, 0.784, and 0.805. Patients were stratified into high- and low-risk groups. An online calculator was developed ( https://borujin.shinyapps.io/dynnomapp/ ). Conclusions: The results indicate that the proposed LR model, utilizing the top seven risk factors, could serve as an effective tool for predicting occurrence of complications in day surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.