ArticleFrontiers in sleep2025
A pilot bedtime routine intervention for toddlers in primary care: variation by caregiver educational attainment.
Article in Frontiers in sleep, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A consistent bedtime routine (≥5 nights per week) is an empirically supported intervention associated with better sleep outcomes. However, few studies have examined the impacts of a bedtime routine on outcomes beyond sleep, and among families of lower educational attainment. Objective: This pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) examined initial outcomes (sleep, development, caregiver stress), feasibility, and acceptability of a primary care-based bedtime routine intervention for toddlers, and explored variation in outcomes by caregiver educational attainment. Method: Caregivers of 86 toddlers ( Results: There were no differences in outcomes between the groups, however, the intervention positively impacted sleep consolidation, social-emotional outcomes, and caregiver stress, primarily at 24 months of age, for toddlers of caregivers with lower educational attainment. Additionally, families in the intervention were more likely to include reading in their bedtime routine at 15 months. Caregivers assigned to the intervention also reported strong acceptability and 85% completed both sessions. Conclusions: This pilot study suggests that bedtime routine intervention for toddlers is acceptable, feasible, and results in increased integration of reading at 15 months of age. Caregivers of lower educational attainment in the intervention condition reported improvements in aspects of child sleep health, social-emotional concerns, and caregiver stress, highlighting the potential for this intervention to reduce sleep health disparities. Future research should continue to examine potential bedtime routine benefits beyond sleep in larger-scale RCTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.