Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41567577›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America2026

Waste Generation in Pediatric Orthopaedic Hardware Removal Surgery.

Tyler M Staten, Wade E Quilter, Brittany N Garcia, Laura L Bellaire

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tyler M StatenSpencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Wade E QuilterSpencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Brittany N GarciaDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Laura L BellaireDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Removal of hardware (ROH) represents the third most common procedure performed by pediatric orthopaedic surgeons. When indicating patients, surgeons must balance the benefits of ROH against its burdens, including patient risk, cost, access, and waste. This study aims to quantify and characterize the waste generated in pediatric ROH surgery to better understand how it contributes to healthcare waste and associated impacts on patient and population health. Methods: A total of 10 pediatric ROH cases were audited at a tertiary care pediatric hospital between January and May 2025. All intraoperative waste was collected, categorized, and weighed. Waste was classified as unused, used but not visibly soiled, or used and visibly soiled. The presence or absence of recycling or other disposal labels was recorded. Waste was evaluated by case and collectively to assess trends, with subgroup analysis performed by waste stream, labeling, and usage. Results: An average of 6.8 kg of solid waste was generated per case, with top contributors being drapes (1.2 kg) and hard plastics (1.14 kg). Waste ranged from 5.3 to 8.1 kg per case. Only 11% (0.24 kg) of plastic waste items included recycling labels, while 7.76 kg of waste went unused (ranging from 5% to 22% of waste per case). Analysis of inter-surgeon variation identified gown and drape quantities as potential targets for waste reduction. Conclusions: Pediatric ROH generates significant waste and cost. Expanding these findings to ROH generally, annual projected waste attributable to ROH in pediatric orthopaedic patients would exceed 450,000 pounds in the United States each year. Landfill waste reduction may be significantly facilitated by greater inclusion of clear recycling labels by manufacturers, regular revision of procedure packs, and avoidance of excessive draping. Surgeons should strive to balance potential harms and surgical risks with the benefits of ROH in each case to promote high-value care. Key Concepts: (1)Pediatric hardware removal surgeries generate significant intraoperative waste, averaging 6.8 kg per case.(2)Over 13% of discarded materials go unused, suggesting that a portion of waste is excessive and unnecessary to the provision of patient care.(3)Only 11% of plastic waste was observed to have recycling labels, underscoring logistical hurdles to appropriately sorting operating room waste.(4)Extrapolated nationally, pediatric ROH procedures are estimated to contribute more than 450,000 pounds of waste annually in the United States, raising important considerations for high-value, sustainable care at scale.(5)Interventions such as clearer labeling, pack optimization, materials innovation, and re-evaluation of procedural indications could meaningfully reduce environmental and financial burdens at scale. Level of Evidence: Level II.

Indexed as

Healthcare sustainabilityPediatric orthopaedic surgeryRemoval of hardwareSurgical wasteWaste reduction

Identifiers

PMID41567577
PMCPMC12818033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.