Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41567557›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry: X2026

A combined study based on electronic tongue and untargeted metabolomics to reveal taste and metabolite profiles of different varieties wampee (

Xiaopeng Wu, Xiaoni Guo, Xiao Xu, Xiuju Gao, Chunhua Xu, Xu Wang, Bingqiang Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry: X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiaopeng WuAnalysis and Test Center, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China.
Xiaoni GuoState Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, College of Food Science and Engineering, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin 300457, China.
Xiao XuAnalysis and Test Center, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China.
Xiuju GaoAnalysis and Test Center, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China.
Chunhua XuInstitute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China.
Xu WangState Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, College of Food Science and Engineering, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin 300457, China.
Bingqiang XuInstitute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wampee is a fruit with a long history of consumption and medicinal value. In this study, four groups of wampee sample from the same nursery were analyzed for systematic analysis of tastes and metabolites using electronic tongue, UHPLC-QTOF-MS/MS and GC-TOF-MS. Through principal component analysis, correlation analysis, OPLS-DA, analysis of variance, and clustered heat map analysis, we performed a comprehensive discrimination of flavors and metabolites of wampees, and performed metabolic pathway KEGG enrichment analysis for differential metabolites. The results showed that there were significant differences in tastes, metabolites, and metabolic pathways among different groups of wampees, and 20 biomarkers could distinguish the groups. A6, A9, and A10 are potentially refreshing and purely sweet varieties. These findings provide metabolic profiling support for a full understanding of the wampee, and provide basic support for wampee species tracing, species selection, and specialty food development.

Indexed as

BiomarkerMetabolic pathwayMetabolomicsTaste analysisWampee

Identifiers

PMID41567557
PMCPMC12816870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.