Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41567551›Full record

ArticleBioMedInformatics2022

Predicting Childhood Obesity Using Machine Learning: Practical Considerations.

Erika R Cheng, Rai Steinhardt, Zina Ben Miled

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMedInformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A Systematic Review on Applications of Artificial Intelligence for Obesity Prevention.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Artificial Intelligence in Obesity Prevention.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Erika R ChengDivision of Children's Health Services Research, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Rai SteinhardtPurdue School of Science, Department of Computer Science, Indiana University Purdue University at Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6490-7600
Zina Ben MiledSchool of Engineering and Technology, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Indiana University Purdue University at Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5401-0368

Funding

Obesity Prevention in Early Life (OPEL): Risk Screening and Targeted InterventionK01DK114383 · NIDDK · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI CHENG, ERIKA ROSE · 2018 to 2022
$754k
NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK114383
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies demonstrate the feasibility of predicting obesity using various machine learning techniques; however, these studies do not address the limitations of these methods in real-life settings where available data for children may vary. We investigated the medical history required for machine learning models to accurately predict body mass index (BMI) during early childhood. Within a longitudinal dataset of children ages 0-4 years, we developed predictive models based on long short-term memory (LSTM), a recurrent neural network architecture, using history EHR data from 2 to 8 clinical encounters to estimate child BMI. We developed separate, sex-stratified models using 80% of the data for training and 20% for external validation. We evaluated model performance using K-fold cross-validation, mean average error (MAE), and Pearson's correlation coefficient (R

Indexed as

BMIchildhood obesityEHRmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID41567551
PMCPMC12818950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.