ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Integrating molecular profiling into glioma diagnosis: implications of the WHO-CNS5-2021 classification of adult-type diffuse gliomas in Colombian patients.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Gliomas are the most frequent type of primary malignant central nervous system (CNS) tumors, representing a group of heterogeneous neoplasms with variable clinical behavior that require adequate diagnostic accuracy. The identification of molecular biomarkers has recently gained significance for the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of CNS tumors; the application of current clinical guidelines is necessary. Our study performed a molecular characterization of gliomas in a cohort of Colombian patients using the recommendations of the 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) CNS 5 classification. Materials and methods: We analyzed 22 Colombian patients with CNS tumors. Molecular techniques including Sanger sequencing, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) and methylation-specific MLPA (MS-MLPA) were used to identify mutations in Results: Our results demonstrated a 23% discordance rate between histopathologic and molecular classifications, with most of the discrepancies due to an initial histopathologic classification of glioblastomas, which were molecularly reclassified as astrocytomas. In addition, molecular profiling allowed us to identify non-canonical mutations, including Discussion: We highlight the importance of incorporating molecular methods to improve diagnostic accuracy and achieve personalized treatments for gliomas, as proposed by the current 2021 WHO CNS 5 tumor classification guidelines. Performing new studies with larger patient cohorts integrating clinical data is necessary to determine the behavior, epidemiology, and therapeutic outcomes of this type of tumor more comprehensively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.