ReviewFrontiers in neurology2025
Autonomic dysfunction and hemodynamic management after acute spinal cord injury: blood pressure targets, perfusion strategies, and emerging therapies.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cuproptosis in spinal cord injury: emerging mechanisms and immunological relevance.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Cardiac size-exercise coupling in Paralympic athletes with spinal cord injury: the role of lesion level.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- IL-33/ST2 Signaling and Microglial Functional-State Transitions After Spinal Cord Injury: Direct Evidence and Mechanistic Hypotheses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Serum Neuritin is a Predictive Biomarker of Poor Neurological Recovery After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Prospective Cohort Study.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Kainate-induced ATP release contributes to spinal excitotoxicity that is attenuated by purinergic blockade.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Acute spinal cord injury (SCI) produces profound cardiovascular instability that exacerbates secondary damage, emphasizing the need for timely blood pressure management and hemodynamic support. While stabilizing hemodynamics is central to acute SCI management, evidence guiding optimal mean arterial pressure (MAP) targets, vasopressor selection, and management strategies remains limited. We conducted a narrative, comprehensive review of peer-reviewed clinical and preclinical studies addressing hemodynamic management after SCI, defined here as the first 7 days after injury, including MAP augmentation, spinal cord perfusion pressure (SCPP) monitoring, vasopressor selection, and neuromodulatory approaches. Results: Observational studies show that even transient hypotensive episodes within the first 72 h worsen neurological recovery. Updated guidelines recommend maintaining MAP between 75 to 80 and 90 to 95 mmHg for 3 to 7 days following injury. Norepinephrine is favored as first-line therapy because it reliably raises MAP with fewer adverse effects than other vasopressors. Neuromodulation with tSCS or eSCS has been shown to restore blood pressure and stabilize cardiovascular control in chronic SCI. Emerging evidence suggest these neuromodulatory approaches may be adapted for acute care. SCPP-guided strategies using lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage or direct intraspinal monitoring better reflect local perfusion and predict outcomes more accurately than MAP alone, although their use is limited to specialized centers. Conclusion: Hemodynamic management after SCI should be considered a therapeutic intervention that directly modifies secondary injury mechanisms. Refining MAP targets, expanding access to SCPP-guided care, and evaluating staged neuromodulation, could enhance precision and individualized care to improve long-term recovery. Large-scale multicenter trials will be essential to establish protocols that improve both neurological and cardiovascular outcomes after SCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.