SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2025
The association between self-perceived stress and ischemic stroke risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: An increasing body of research indicates that psychological stress is a contributing factor to stroke. Nonetheless, the correlations between self-perceived stress and stroke remain ambiguous. We performed the first meta-analysis on the correlation between self-perceived stress and stroke risk, establishing a clear relationship between self-perceived stress and stroke. Methods: Two reviewers independently searched electronic databases (MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EMBASE database) for stroke and self-perceived stress studies. Studies employing the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Single question, or 2 single-item questions assessment tools were included, studies were executed and presented in English from inception to March 7, 2025. Eleven papers were included into this meta-analysis. Results: (1) In our meta-analysis, the multivariable-adjusted relative risk (RR) indicated that self-perceived stress was independently associated with stroke risk. (2) Subgroup analysis revealed that individuals with high self-perceived stress had a significantly elevated stroke risk, whereas no significant association was observed in those with low self-perceived stress. (3) Furthermore, our meta-analysis demonstrated that elevated self-perceived stress was associated with higher stroke mortality; (4) In sex-specific analysis, self-perceived stress was significantly associated with increased stroke risk in women, but not in men. Conclusion: Self-perceived stress was associated with increased stroke risk, especially in individuals reporting moderate-high self-perceived stress levels and women. Furthermore, elevated self-perceived stress was correlated with stroke mortality. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO, CRD420251026081.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.