Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41567532›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2025

Brain functional changes following spinal manipulation therapy in patients with lumbar disc herniation and chronic low back pain: a scoping review.

Lizhen Cao, Jing Shu, Bibao Li

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lizhen CaoDepartment of Nursing, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China.
Jing ShuDepartment of Nursing, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China.
Bibao LiHubei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Chronic low back pain (LBP) is a common symptom in patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH), and spinal manipulation-related therapies can alleviate pain. This study aimed to review the clinical research evidence regarding the central nervous mechanisms of spinal manipulation in treating chronic lower back pain related to lumbar disc herniation, summarize the current state of research, identify existing gaps, and lay the foundation for future studies. Methods: This scoping review was conducted according to established methodological frameworks. Original studies were retrieved from eight databases from inception to August 1, 2025. Of the 169 articles, 10 were ultimately selected as meeting the inclusion criteria. The data were systematically organized and categorized according to the research objectives. Results: The ten included studies demonstrated that spinal manipulation therapies induce significant changes in brain activity and connectivity. Key findings include modulation of the prefrontal cortex, visual network, and default mode network. These neuroplastic changes were correlated with improvements in clinical pain intensity (VAS), functional disability (ODI, JOA), and emotional states (SAS, SDS). Acupoint-specific manipulation was found to elicit distinct brain activation patterns compared to non-acupoint stimulation. Conclusion: Preliminary findings indicate that spinal manipulation-related therapies may alleviate LDH-associated chronic low back pain and mood disorders by modulating regions such as the prefrontal cortex, the visual network, and the default mode network. The development of standardized clinical practices and clarification of central nervous mechanisms are vital for improving pain management in this population group. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251109911, CRD420251109911.

Indexed as

brain mechanismsfMRIlumbar disc herniationpainspinal manipulation therapy

Identifiers

PMID41567532
PMCPMC12815715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.