Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41567504›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

High frequency spike inference with particle Gibbs sampling.

Giovanni Diana, B Semihcan Sermet, Gerard J Broussard, Samuel S-H Wang, David A DiGregorio

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Giovanni DianaInstitut Pasteur, University of Paris, CNRS UMR 3571, Synapse and Circuit Dynamics Laboratory, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7497-5271
B Semihcan SermetInstitut Pasteur, University of Paris, CNRS UMR 3571, Synapse and Circuit Dynamics Laboratory, Paris, France.
Gerard J BroussardPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton, NJ 08544.
Samuel S-H WangPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton, NJ 08544.
David A DiGregorioInstitut Pasteur, University of Paris, CNRS UMR 3571, Synapse and Circuit Dynamics Laboratory, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6417-4566

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calcium-sensitive fluorescent indicators enable monitoring of spiking activity in large neuronal populations in animal models. Despite the plethora of algorithms developed over the past decades, accurate spike-time inference methods for spike rates exceeding 20 Hz are lacking. More importantly, little attention has been devoted to the quantification of statistical uncertainties in spike time estimation, which is essential for assigning confidence levels to inferred spike patterns. To address these challenges, we introduce (1) a statistical model that accounts for bursting neuronal activity and baseline fluorescence modulation and (2) apply a Monte Carlo strategy (particle Gibbs with ancestor sampling) to estimate the joint posterior distribution of spike times and model parameters. Our method is competitive with state-of-the-art supervised and unsupervised algorithms, as evaluated on the CASCADE benchmark datasets. Analysis of fluorescence transients recorded with the ultrafast genetically encoded calcium indicator GCaMP8f demonstrates that our method can resolve interspike intervals as short as 5 ms. Overall, our study describes a Bayesian inference method for detecting neuronal spiking patterns and quantifying their uncertainty. The use of particle Gibbs samplers enables unbiased estimates of spike times and all model parameters, and provides a flexible statistical framework for testing more specific models of calcium indicators.

Identifiers

PMID41567504
PMCPMC12817329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.