Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41567469›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2025

The effectiveness of virtual reality for K-12 foreign language learning: a systematic review of recent randomized controlled trials.

Lu Sun, Xiacheng Song

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lu SunXi'an Fanyi University, Xi'an, China.
Xiacheng SongInstitute of Visual Informatics, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite the increasing adoption of immersive Virtual Reality (VR) in K-12 educational settings, there is a notable absence of systematic, high-quality experimental research evaluating its efficacy in facilitating foreign language acquisition. Methods: Following a systematic search of five databases that yielded 1,054 records, six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met the inclusion criteria. Because of considerable heterogeneity, a narrative synthesis was conducted following the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) guideline, with findings structured into a primary contrast (VR vs. non-VR) and a secondary analysis (VR vs. VR designs). Results: The primary contrast analysis indicated that VR interventions generally had a positive effect compared to non-VR controls, particularly for vocabulary and listening. A notable finding was a consistent positive effect for VR in promoting long-term knowledge retention. The risk of bias evaluation indicated that each of the included studies was classified as presenting "some concerns". Conclusion: Across a small and heterogeneous set of recent RCTs, immersive VR shows promising effects, especially for long-term retention. However, the evidence for immediate learning gains is inconclusive. A more critical finding is the profound heterogeneity and methodological concerns within the evidence base, which preclude any single, overarching conclusion about VR's effectiveness.

Indexed as

educational technologyforeign language learningK-12 educationsystematic reviewvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID41567469
PMCPMC12816172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.