ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Latent profiles of psychological wellbeing and psychological resources in Türkiye: tolerance, patience, compassion satisfaction, psychological flexibility.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: The aim of this study is to identify psychological wellbeing profiles based on the variables of tolerance, patience, compassion satisfaction, and psychological flexibility within the context of Türkiye sample, and to examine whether these profiles differ across demographic subgroups. Sample: The study was conducted with Method: Data were collected using the Patience Scale, Compassion Satisfaction Scale, Tolerance Scale, Psychological Flexibility Scale, and Psychological Well-Being Scale. The construct validity of the scales was tested through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and the fit indices were found to be at acceptable levels. Internal consistency was confirmed using Cronbach's alpha coefficients. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to identify distinct psychological profiles. The relationship between participant profiles and socio-demographic variables was examined using the chi-square test. Results: Considering parsimony and theoretical interpretability, a three-cluster solution was selected as the final model. The profiles corresponded to high, moderate, and low levels across all indicators and were labeled as "High," "Moderate," and "Low Psychological Well-Being and Psychological Resources." Correlations among the variables were generally found to be moderately positive. After considering demographic variables, it was found that profiles with higher psychological wellbeing and psychological resources were associated with being female, married, and having a high level of education. Conclusion: Overall, the findings suggest that psychological wellbeing in Türkiye sample can be better understood through heterogeneous subgroups and provide insights for the design of culturally sensitive interventions and programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.