Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41567456›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Latent profiles of psychological wellbeing and psychological resources in Türkiye: tolerance, patience, compassion satisfaction, psychological flexibility.

Semra Kiye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Semra KiyeDepartment of Guidance and Psychological Counseling, Faculty of Education, Muş Alparslan University, Muş, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study is to identify psychological wellbeing profiles based on the variables of tolerance, patience, compassion satisfaction, and psychological flexibility within the context of Türkiye sample, and to examine whether these profiles differ across demographic subgroups. Sample: The study was conducted with Method: Data were collected using the Patience Scale, Compassion Satisfaction Scale, Tolerance Scale, Psychological Flexibility Scale, and Psychological Well-Being Scale. The construct validity of the scales was tested through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and the fit indices were found to be at acceptable levels. Internal consistency was confirmed using Cronbach's alpha coefficients. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to identify distinct psychological profiles. The relationship between participant profiles and socio-demographic variables was examined using the chi-square test. Results: Considering parsimony and theoretical interpretability, a three-cluster solution was selected as the final model. The profiles corresponded to high, moderate, and low levels across all indicators and were labeled as "High," "Moderate," and "Low Psychological Well-Being and Psychological Resources." Correlations among the variables were generally found to be moderately positive. After considering demographic variables, it was found that profiles with higher psychological wellbeing and psychological resources were associated with being female, married, and having a high level of education. Conclusion: Overall, the findings suggest that psychological wellbeing in Türkiye sample can be better understood through heterogeneous subgroups and provide insights for the design of culturally sensitive interventions and programs.

Indexed as

compassion satisfactionlatent profile analysispatiencepsychological flexibilitypsychological wellbeingtolerance

Identifiers

PMID41567456
PMCPMC12815756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.