Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41567448›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Is happiness for all? The happiness halo effect on coworkers' perceptions.

Avital Amir, Zeev Shtudiner, Tal Shavit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Avital AmirDepartment of Economics and Business Administration, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.
Zeev ShtudinerDepartment of Economics and Business Administration, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.
Tal ShavitDepartment of Economics and Business Administration, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The halo effect is a cognitive bias, in which a specific attribute of an individual influences their overall evaluation. The "halo effect of happiness" refers to a situation in which happier individuals receive a more positive global evaluation. While previous research assessed perceptions of happy employees by supervisors, this study examines how happy colleagues are perceived by their peers. We hypothesize that employees' happiness would positively predict their perceptions of happy colleagues' performance, and that affective attitudes and trust would mediate this relationship. Methods: A sample of 863 employees in the United States completed an online survey assessing their perceptions of happy colleagues' job performance, affective attitudes and trust, and various measures of happiness. Results: The findings indicate that there is a happiness halo effect in perceptions of happy colleagues' performance and reveal that employees' own happiness predicts these perceptions through their affective attitudes and trust in happy colleagues. Discussion: Overall, this study highlights that while their colleagues generally perceive happy employees positively, unhappy colleagues may perceive them less favorably. Organizations should consider the diverse needs of all employees to enhance overall wellbeing.

Indexed as

employee perceptionsemployee wellbeinghappiness halo effectjob performancepeerevaluation

Identifiers

PMID41567448
PMCPMC12815774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.