Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41567434›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

University students' thriving during remote and in-person instruction in the COVID-19 pandemic: longitudinal evidence from two academic years.

Jannika Haase, Lysann Zander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jannika HaaseDivision of Empirical Educational Research, Institute of Education, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hanover, Germany.
Lysann ZanderDivision of Empirical Educational Research, Institute of Education, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hanover, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: A substantial body of research has demonstrated the negative repercussions of the COVID-19 pandemic on university students' mental health and well-being. Less is known about students' thriving, defined as a specific sense of personal growth encompassing experiences of vitality and learning. Methods: Using a longitudinal dataset ( Results: During the period of remote instruction, we found intraindividual decreases in students' thriving toward T2 in winter 2020/2021. When universities had resumed in-person instruction in winter 2021/2022 (T4), we found intraindividual increases in students' vitality and learning. Intraindividual changes in thriving toward all later time points did not differ by gender or by college generation status. Discussion: We discuss our findings against the background of the study-related stressors that students faced during remote and in-person instruction, as well as the instructional measures implemented by the respective university over the course of the pandemic.

Indexed as

college generation statusgenderhigher educationremote/in-person instructionthriving

Identifiers

PMID41567434
PMCPMC12815859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.