ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Diagnostic efficacy of fecal markers combined with alarm symptoms in distinguishing functional and organic abdominal pain in children.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Commentary: Diagnostic efficacy of fecal markers combined with alarm symptoms in distinguishing functional and organic abdominal pain in children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study assessed the diagnostic potential of fecal markers, calprotectin (FC), and occult blood (OB), in conjunction with alarm symptoms and blood markers, to differentiate functional abdominal pain (FAP) from organic disease in children. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of children with chronic abdominal pain who presented between April 2017 and April 2020, which included 347 classified as FAP and 224 classified as organic disease. Children with constipation in the functional group were included, and a slight elevation in FC in that group was considered non-inflammatory. FC interpretation included age/sex norms as opposed to percentiles, utilizing the cutoff of 60 µg/g, with justification given by the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition diagnostic criteria ( Results: The organic disease had significantly greater alarm symptoms and abnormal fecal and blood indices compared with FAP ( Conclusion: The combination of alarm symptoms with fecal FC and OB tests provides a sensitive and specific non-invasive strategy for the differentiation of organic from FAP in children. The mild elevation of FC is likely indicative of functional constipation rather than inflammation, and attention should be given to diet and substances that affect OB outcome, specifically in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.