Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41567410›Full record

ArticleDigital health

An ultrasound-based machine learning model for predicting pelvic adhesions: A SHAP-enhanced XGBoost approach.

Yanyan Huang, Shanshan Su, Jiemin Chen, Xiaoqian Zhang, Kailing Tan, Qiuling Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yanyan HuangDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3642-4182
Shanshan SuDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3850-3968
Jiemin ChenDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China.
Xiaoqian ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China.
Kailing TanDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China.
Qiuling GuoDepartment of Ultrasound, Quanzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital (Quanzhou Children's Hospital), Quanzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study is the first to develop and evaluate a machine learning (ML) model for predicting pelvic adhesions based on ultrasound features, utilizing the SHapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) framework for interpretability analysis. Methods: This prospective study included 220 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery and preoperative ultrasound assessments at our hospital between April 2023 and June 2024. Patients were randomly assigned to training and validation sets. A Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression was used to identify independent risk factors, followed by incorporation into an Extreme Gradient Boosting prediction model. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots, and a decision curve analysis. Results: The included patients were randomly divided into a training set and a validation set in a 7:3 ratio. The final model included four predictors-obstructed ovarian activity, surgical history, endometriosis, and gynecological inflammation-and demonstrated strong discriminatory performance, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.869 and 0.846 in the training and validation sets, respectively. The ML model demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.946 and a specificity of 0.597 in the training set, while in the validation set, it achieved a sensitivity of 1.000 and a specificity of 0.600. Calibration analyses showed good agreement between predicted and observed outcomes. The model exhibited high clinical utility. SHAP analysis revealed that endometriosis contributed most significantly to the predictions, followed by surgical history, obstructed ovarian activity, and gynecological inflammation. Conclusions: The interpretable ML model developed in this study demonstrates strong predictive performance for assessing the risk of pelvic adhesions in patients prior to surgery. It can be utilized to accurately identify high-risk patients before the procedure, enabling the implementation of appropriate measures during surgery to reduce the occurrence of postoperative pelvic adhesions.

Indexed as

laparoscopic surgeryPelvic adhesionsSHAPultrasonographyXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID41567410
PMCPMC12816560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.