ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Early detection of soybean mosaic virus using portable Raman spectroscopy coupled with machine learning.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Soybean mosaic virus (SMV) is one of the major pathogens affecting global soybean yield and quality, and its early and accurate detection is essential for disease warning and precision management. This study proposes a non-invasive early detection method by integrating portable Raman spectroscopy with artificial intelligence algorithms. Methods: Raman spectra of leaves from both resistant and susceptible soybean cultivars were collected at different infection stages (0, 2, 4, and 6 days post-inoculation), and preprocessed using Savitzky-Golay (S-G) smoothing and adaptive iteratively reweighted penalized least squares (Air-PLS) baseline correction. Four classification models-1D-CNN, SVM, KNN, and BP-ANN-were developed to classify samples from different infection stages. Results: Spectral feature analysis revealed significant changes in carotenoid levels caused by viral infection, and distinct spectral responses between resistant and susceptible cultivars during disease progression. Among the four classification models, the 1D-CNN model achieved the highest prediction accuracy of 90%. In addition, principal component analysis (PCA) indicated that the Raman spectroscopy-based method significantly advanced the early detection of SMV (SC3) to 4 days post-inoculation, compared to 7-10 days required by conventional methods. Discussion: This evidences the superior capability of Raman spectroscopy for monitoring the dynamics of SMV infection and its potential to considerably reduce the duration of diagnosis. This study confirms the feasibility and efficiency of Raman spectroscopy combined with deep learning for in situ early detection of plant viral diseases and provides a promising reference for non-destructive diagnosis of early-stage foliar infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.