Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41567388›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025

Machine learning models using multimodal data accurately predict chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity in breast cancer.

Kundi Chen, Yuqiong An, Zhen Wang, Fang Nie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kundi Chen *Ultrasound Medical Center, Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Yuqiong An *Ultrasound Medical Center, Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Zhen WangUltrasound Medical Center, Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Fang NieUltrasound Medical Center, Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite significant advances in breast cancer therapy, chemotherapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) remains a critical clinical challenge. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML) models that integrate multimodal data to predict the risk of CTRCD in female breast cancer patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 423 female breast cancer patients who received chemotherapy between January 2020 and January 2025. Multimodal data included demographic information, clinical variables, echocardiographic parameters, electrocardiographic (ECG) findings, and cardiac biomarkers. The dataset was randomly split into training and validation sets in a 7:3 ratio. Seven feature selection methods and eight ML algorithms were employed to construct and compare predictive models. Results: Among the 423 patients, CTRCD occurred in 111 patients (26.24%). Five variables were identified as robust predictors: age, baseline left ventricular ejection fraction <60%, anthracycline-trastuzumab combination therapy, chemotherapy cycles, and abnormal ECG findings. Among all models evaluated, the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm demonstrated the best performance, achieving an area under the curve of 0.782 (95% CI: 0.681-0.883) in 10-fold cross-validation. Conclusion: The XGBoost-based model showed strong predictive ability and may serve as a practical tool for early risk stratification and timely clinical management of CTRCD.

Indexed as

breast cancercardiotoxicitychemotherapy-related cardiac dysfunctionmachine learningmultimodal dataprediction model

Identifiers

PMID41567388
PMCPMC12816329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.