ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Arrhythmias across the tree of life: comparative insights for human electrophysiology.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Arrhythmias in non-human animals offer insights into human electrophysiology, yet physicians may be unaware of their occurrence and significance. This paper presents selected examples of arrhythmias in dogs, horses, and birds- as an invitation to human cardiologists to explore how animal models can illuminate mechanisms, genetics, and therapeutic approaches relevant to human electrophysiology. Methods: Leading veterinary cardiologists compiled overviews of common arrhythmias in dogs, cats, horses and birds. Genetic predisposition, natural history, therapeutic approaches, and epidemiology were compared across these species and humans, highlighting translational opportunities. Results: Common human arrhythmias including atrial fibrillation, bradycardia, ventricular tachycardia, and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy occur naturally in dogs, cats, horses, and birds. Cross-species differences in disease expression provide unique insights into mechanisms of arrhythmia vulnerability and resistance. Dogs develop similar inherited arrhythmogenic diseases but with distinct phenotypes. Horses experience atrial fibrillation without thromboembolic complications, revealing potential protective pathways. They also demonstrate extreme exercise-induced arrhythmia susceptibility, isolating exercise as an arrhythmogenic trigger. Avian species exhibit remarkable adaptation to cardiac loading conditions that would be pathological in mammals. These comparative observations across species highlight novel mechanisms underlying both susceptibility and resistance to arrhythmias and conduction disorders, offering unexplored therapeutic targets for human patients. Discussion: Cross-species knowledge offers direct translational value for human electrophysiology-from genetic markers in Labrador Retrievers with supraventricular tachycardia to cardiac loading paradigms in broiler chickens. Breaking down disciplinary barriers through shared research initiatives and integrated training represents an essential, underutilized strategy for advancing arrhythmia diagnosis, treatment, and prevention in human patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.