Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41567345›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in drug safety2026

Machine learning risk prediction models for medication harm in hospitalised adult patients.

Jonathan Yong Jie Lam, Michael Barras, Ian A Scott, Hassan Masood, Ahmad Abdel-Hafez, Nazanin Falconer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in drug safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jonathan Yong Jie LamSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Queensland, 20 Cornwall Street, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9394-0776
Michael BarrasSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8105-0090
Ian A ScottCentre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7596-0837
Hassan MasoodMetro South Digital Health and Informatics Division, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9390-169X
Ahmad Abdel-HafezCollege of Computing and Information Technology, University of Doha for Science and Technology, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6022-9745
Nazanin FalconerSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4682-7890

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Medication harm is a significant healthcare challenge in hospitalised adult patients. Machine learning (ML) approaches offer the potential to improve prediction accuracy for medication harm by capturing complex relationships among clinical risk factors that traditional statistical models may not detect. Objective: To develop and evaluate ML models for predicting medication harm in hospitalised adult patients. Design: ML study involving secondary use of a prospectively collected hospital cohort dataset. Methods: This study used data from 279 adult patients admitted to general medical and geriatric wards of a tertiary hospital, among whom 40 experienced 51 medication harm events. Eight ML models were trained and evaluated for identifying patients at risk of medication harm. Medication harm cases were identified through detailed chart reviews, trigger tools, voluntary incident reporting, and International Classification of Diseases version 10 discharge coding. Data were pre-processed with missing values imputed using median imputation. Ten predictive features were selected using recursive feature elimination and clinical expert opinion. Models were trained using stratified 10-fold cross-validation with an 80/20 train-test split. Class imbalance was addressed using an oversampling approach. Results: A random forest model demonstrated the highest performance, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.76, precision of 0.50, recall of 0.62, F1 score of 0.54, accuracy of 0.86, specificity of 0.90, and an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.47. Predictive features of importance included length of stay, depression, dementia, insulin use, number of medications (⩾15), age (⩾65), opioid use, and antibiotic use. Conclusion: This study highlights the potential of ML models to predict medication harm, enabling early identification of high-risk patients for preventive interventions. Interdisciplinary collaboration is essential in developing robust, clinically relevant models that can be used to improve patient safety.

Indexed as

machine learningmedication harmpatient safetypredictive model

Identifiers

PMID41567345
PMCPMC12816511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.