Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41567329›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025

The association between polyphenol consumption and stroke risk factors in Saudi Arabia.

Sarah N Alsharif

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sarah N AlsharifDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Eating foods rich in polyphenols has been shown in numerous trials to lower the incidence of stroke. The present study aimed to evaluate the relationship between stroke risk variables and the consumption of polyphenols. Methods: An online questionnaire was used to conduct a cross-sectional study involving 293 healthy persons aged at least 18 years in Saudi Arabia. Information was gathered on the demographics, health, use of supplements or drugs, smoking, anthropometric measures, physical activity, and dietary intake of six food products high in polyphenols. Results: The mean age of the participants was 34.82 ± 14.06 years, 72.7% were women, 51.5% were married, and 63.1% had a university education. Of them, 23.5% were obese and 62.8% were performing physical activity. Almost all participants had ≥3 modifiable stroke risk factors. Coffee was the most consumed polyphenol product (91.3%), followed by dates (88.7%) and apples (88.4%). Foods high in polyphenols were consumed anywhere from four to five times per day to less than once per month. The most commonly consumed polyphenol-rich foods were found in black tea, coffee, and apples. Except for milk chocolate, older participants consumed significantly greater amounts of polyphenol-containing food than younger ones. A higher intake of apples or dark chocolate was associated with a lower probability of having a stroke. Additionally, the risk of stroke is decreased by consuming more dark chocolate, cocoa powder, coffee, apples, black tea, and green tea. Discussion: Overall, adult Saudi Arabians who consumed more of a specific food high in polyphenols had a lower incidence of stroke. Additional long-term cohort studies is recommended to obtain more precise dietary data and to take into account randomized controlled trials to prove causation.

Indexed as

associationconsumptionpolyphenolsriskSaudistroke

Identifiers

PMID41567329
PMCPMC12815862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.