ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2025
CAD/CAM and Digital Flow Training in Dental Hygiene Vocational Education.
Review in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The integration of digital technologies, such as CAD/CAM systems, into dental practice has significantly transformed both clinical workflows and educational methodologies. However, their incorporation into vocational training programs for Dental Hygiene remains limited. This study aimed to assess the level of familiarity, training, and perceptions related to CAD/CAM technologies and digital workflows among students enrolled in a Higher Technician in Dental Hygiene program. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 327 students enrolled in in-person, blended, and online modalities at a vocational training center in Seville, Spain. Data were collected using a validated 34-item questionnaire addressing demographics, digital literacy, and the perceived educational value of digital tools. Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square test and Cramér's V. Results: The sample was predominantly female (91.4%), with participants ranging in age from 18 to over 50 years. While 90.5% reported satisfaction with their academic program, 42.8% were unfamiliar with the term digital workflow, and 53.8% did not recognize the concept of CAD/CAM. Furthermore, 64.2% had received no prior training in digital workflows. Nonetheless, 89.3% of respondents expressed interest in incorporating such technologies into their curriculum, and 81.7% believed that 3D digital tools would be beneficial to their training. Statistically significant associations were observed between digital proficiency and positive attitudes toward the educational and clinical relevance of digital dentistry. Conclusions: These findings reveal a considerable gap in current curricula, but also a strong willingness among students to adopt technological advancements. Integrating digital workflows and CAD/CAM systems into vocational training programs appears essential to better prepare students and align educational offerings with modern professional standards in dentistry.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.