ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2025
Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Vital Pulp Therapy Among Dental Professionals in Taif, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-sectional Study.
Review in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Vital pulp therapy (VPT) is a key regenerative approach in the field of endodontics and a recognized therapeutic method for permanent teeth by several practice organizations. This study aimed to examine the knowledge and attitudes toward VPT in permanent teeth, and the adoption of the updated practice guidelines among dentists in Taif, Saudi Arabia. Material and Methods: Data were collected from 197 general dentists and specialists practicing in Taif using an anonymous questionnaire. It comprised four sections: demographics, questions regarding the indications and diagnosis of VPT (Domain 1), VPT for immature permanent teeth (Domain 2), and the different materials and restorations utilized in VPT (Domain 3). The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and linear regression. Results: 80% of the participants possessed adequate knowledge in Domain 1; however, misconceptions were evident (83.2%) regarding the limitations of VPT in patients with reversible pulpitis. The knowledge levels were lower in Domains 2 and 3 (73%) compared with Domain 1. Misconceptions were common (69.5%) regarding the appropriate timing for permanent coronal restoration placement and the diagnostic role of sodium hypochlorite. Furthermore, age and workplace significantly influenced VPT knowledge, with higher knowledge observed among young dentists (aged 25-34 years) and lower knowledge noted among private sector dentists. Conclusions: Although most dentists exhibited acceptable knowledge and attitudes, gaps were evident in case selection, restoration timing, and material application. Targeted education and ongoing training are needed, particularly for private sector dentists and those with limited experience, to improve endodontic care in the Taif region.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.