ReviewFrontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry2025
Efficacy and safety of atomoxetine in the treatment of ADHD in children and adolescents: a systematic review.
Review in Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of atomoxetine in the treatment of adolescents with ADHD, comparing its effects with other available treatments. The primary outcome was the reduction of ADHD symptoms, and the secondary outcome was the occurrence of adverse effects. Methods: A search was conducted in the Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases. The research question and strategy were based on the PICO model. Inclusion criteria were restricted to studies involving children and adolescents aged 6-16 years, focusing on comparisons between atomoxetine and other treatments. Eligible studies were published in English, Spanish, or Portuguese, with no restrictions on publication year. A total of 575 articles were initially retrieved. After removing duplicates, 527 references were screened by title and abstract, and 69 were selected for full-text review. Following this stage, 63 references were excluded, and 6 studies were ultimately deemed eligible. Results: The six included studies involved a total of 905 participants. Atomoxetine demonstrated comparable efficacy to methylphenidate in reducing ADHD symptoms. The most common adverse effects were nausea, fatigue, and appetite changes. No severe adverse events were consistently reported. Atomoxetine's efficacy was particularly evident in patients who did not tolerate or respond to stimulant medications. Conclusion: Available evidence suggests that atomoxetine is an effective and safe option for treating ADHD in adolescents, representing a valid alternative particularly for patients who do not tolerate stimulant medications. Continued research, especially long-term studies, is necessary to confirm its efficacy across different patient subgroups. Systematic Review Registration: Identifier CRD420251152121.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.