ArticlePediatric gastroenterology, hepatology & nutrition2026
Prospective Evaluation of a Novel Scoring System for Managing Foreign Body Ingestion in Children.
Article in Pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology & nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Foreign Body Ingestion in Children: A Narrative Review of Time-Critical Risk Stratification and Contemporary Management.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate a novel scoring system for the management of foreign body ingestion in children. A simple scoring system can greatly aid in clinical decision-making. Methods: We developed a novel scoring system that considers several critical factors, including patient age, mood, and symptoms, as well as the characteristics of the ingested foreign body, such as its type, location, and size. This system was designed to help emergency department residents determine the most appropriate course of action. Based on their scores, the children were categorized into two classes: Class A (observation) and Class B (pediatrician consultation), and further subcategorized as Class B1 and B2. Results: A total of 158 children were evaluated using this scoring system, with 79 confirmed cases of foreign body ingestion. Class A patients had a higher rate of successful observation and minimal intervention, whereas Class B patients had a higher rate of invasive treatment. Importantly, there were very few unnecessary invasive procedures, and the recommendations made by the scoring system were closely aligned with those made by a reference management algorithm. Conclusion: Our novel scoring system demonstrates substantial potential for guiding residents in the appropriate management of pediatric foreign body ingestion, ensuring that children receive the most suitable level of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.