Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41567248›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Database of recurrent mutations, an unbiased web resource to browse recurrent mutations in cancers.

Deepankar Chakroborty, Katri Vaparanta, Bishwa Ghimire, Ilkka Paatero, Kari J Kurppa, Klaus Elenius

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. An investigative network analysis mapping global cancer epidemiology.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Deepankar ChakrobortyInstitute of Biomedicine and Medicity Research Laboratories, University of Turku, 20520 Turku, Finland.
Katri VaparantaInstitute of Biomedicine and Medicity Research Laboratories, University of Turku, 20520 Turku, Finland.
Bishwa GhimireInstitute of Biomedicine and Medicity Research Laboratories, University of Turku, 20520 Turku, Finland.
Ilkka PaateroTurku Bioscience Center, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, 20520 Turku, Finland.
Kari J KurppaInstitute of Biomedicine and Medicity Research Laboratories, University of Turku, 20520 Turku, Finland.
Klaus EleniusInstitute of Biomedicine and Medicity Research Laboratories, University of Turku, 20520 Turku, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Existing cancer-associated variant databases contain biases arising from duplicate entries and the inclusion of targeted sequencing panels, which interfere with accurate estimation somatic mutation frequency in cancer cohorts. To address this, we developed the Database of Recurrent Mutations (DORM), a web resource derived exclusively from whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing data. By filtering out targeted screens and non-recurrent variants, our analysis reveals that mutation recurrence significantly correlates with oncogenic activity, loss of tumor suppressor function, and unfavorable patient prognosis. In a pan-cancer analysis of EGFR, DORM identified frequent mutations outside the kinase domain that are underrepresented in other databases. This resource offers a streamlined, unbiased platform for mutation frequency analysis, enhancing biomarker discovery and the assessment of clinical variant significance.

Indexed as

Biocomputational methodCancerComputational bioinformatics

Identifiers

PMID41567248
PMCPMC12818146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.