ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Efficacy of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective cohort study with propensity-score matching.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a collagen score-based prediction model for neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy efficacy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Review
- Neoadjuvant Therapy for Esophageal Cancer.Cancers · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study compared the efficacy of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT) followed by surgery versus upfront surgery for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods: In this prospective controlled trial (2020-2025), 623 stage II-IIIB ESCC patients were included; 192 received nICT (cisplatin, nab-paclitaxel, sintilimab) before surgery, and 431 underwent direct surgery. Propensity-score matching (PSM) and overlap weighting were used to adjust for baseline confounders. Results: After PSM (144 pairs), the nICT group showed significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS; HR = 0.31, p<0.001) and overall survival (OS; HR = 0.42, p=0.002) compared to the upfront surgery group. The nICT group also had higher 1-/3-year PFS (88.8%/84.3% vs. 68.1%/52.8%) and OS rates (94.8%/84.7% vs. 89.6%/65.2%). Sensitivity analysis using overlap weighting confirmed these robust findings (PFS: HR = 0.37, p<0.001; OS: HR = 0.62, p=0.033). Conclusions: For locally advanced ESCC, neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy significantly improves both PFS and OS compared to upfront surgery, establishing it as a highly effective treatment strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.