ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
A novel liquid-liquid phase separation related gene signature including ARL6IP4 predicts prognosis and immune landscape in colorectal cancer.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Targeting phase separation: a new strategy to disrupt the stromal-immune axis in colorectal cancer.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks as the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) is a phenomenon driven by multivalent weak interactions among biomolecules, such as proteins and nucleic acids, which results in the formation of biomolecular condensates. Abnormal LLPS is closely linked to tumorigenesis and progression. However, a prognostic signature based on LLPS-related genes (LRGs) has rarely been established in CRC. Methods: We retrieved CRC data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases. LRGs were obtained from the DrLLPS database. A novel signature was developed in the TCGA training cohort using univariate Cox regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression and multivariate Cox regression. Subsequently, a risk signature termed the LLPS-related risk score (LRS) was introduced, categorizing CRC patients into high-risk and low-risk groups based on their LRS. Furthermore, the efficacy of the risk signature was evaluated using principal component analysis (PCA), Kaplan-Meier survival, receiver operating characteristic (ROC), nomogram, and concordance index (C-index). Additionally, the differences in immune cell infiltration, immune function, the tumor microenvironment (TME), drug sensitivity, and tumor mutation burden (TMB) between these risk subgroups were analyzed. Importantly, experimental investigations were conducted to assess the expression levels and LLPS capabilities of ARF Like GTPase 6 Interacting Protein 4 (ARL6IP4)in CRC. Results: We developed an eight-LRG prognostic risk signature based on LRGs and confirmed its role as an independent prognostic factor for patients with CRC. Additionally, we observed significant differences in immune cell infiltration, immune function, and TME between the low-risk and high-risk groups. Furthermore, the low-risk group demonstrated a lower Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion (TIDE) score and exhibited greater sensitivity to certain clinical therapeutic agents. Moreover, ARL6IP4 was found to be upregulated in CRC and underwent LLPS in live cells. Conclusion: We constructed and validated an eight-LRG risk signature, which can be employed to predict prognosis, characterize the immune landscape, and assess drug sensitivity in CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.